According to North Queensland Register
Mackay Sugar’s $120 million Cogeneration Project is fast taking shape, with preliminary site works already completed and civil works set to commence at Racecourse Mill next week.
Mackay Sugar CEO Quinton Hildebrand said the plant would produce enough clean renewable energy to provide one-third of the Mackay region’s electricity requirements and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 200,000 tonnes (t) equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2e) each year.
Had desperation to find alternative energy source pushed people into converting sugar into energy? Let’s examine the pros & cons of using sugar as alternative energy to fossil fuel.
Pros (as stated in the article)
- Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 200,000 tonnes (t) equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2e) each year.
- Provide one-third of the Mackay region’s electricity requirements
- The plant will also generate significantly more income from the same sugarcane crop, delivering exceptional value to shareholders
- provide more than 250 jobs during construction, with construction contracts being awarded to local Mackay companies.
- take advantage of the untapped potential from Mackay Sugar’s cane supply
Cons
- Sudden surge in sugar prices for human consumption in the region
- Hyper-inflation in food prices that uses sugar
- High fluctuation of energy supply during a “bad” harvesting season due to natural disasters.
- Technically not 100% fossil fuel free as pesticides are oil based, fertilizers are natural gas, harvesters uses oil too.
Overall, sugar will eventually be just like oil and we will no longer have a normal fizzy drinks with sugar anymore or prepare to pay more for it…and there goes my sugar donut or my 3 in 1 coffee.
Sugar like oil can push inflation too causing more hardship in the global economy too, all that sounds like a bad idea but alternative energy need a balance of every possible energy sources. Hopefully, we can research more into a more abundant source of renewable energy.
Popularity: 5% [?]





